Dishonesty & Dismissal

When an allegation of dishonesty arises, the pressure to act decisively is intense. But a dismissal will only stand if the employer can prove its case with reliable evidence and a fair, defensible process.

Join labour-law expert Angus Bailie for a practical 90-minute webinar on the important Labour Court decision in Mpact Operations (Pty) Ltd v Metal and Engineering Bargaining Council and Others.

Dishonesty & Dismissal: The Mpact Operations Judgement Explained

The Mpact Operations judgement is a timely reminder that allegations alone are not enough. It puts the spotlight on careful investigations, preservation of evidence, and the reasoning needed to sustain a dismissal when challenged.

Angus will unpack what the judgement means in practice for employers, HR teams, school leaders, and anyone responsible for workplace discipline.

What we’ll cover

• What the Mpact Operations judgement decided

• Why evidence preservation and a sound investigation matter

• How dishonesty, misconduct and fraud differ in disciplinary cases

• When dismissal may be appropriate — and when it may not be

• Establishing dishonesty without overstating the case

• Preparing a defensible disciplinary hearing

• Practical approaches to charges, evidence and written reasoning

• Key lessons for reducing risk at the CCMA and bargaining councils

This is a focused, practical session designed to help organisations handle high-risk dishonesty matters with greater confidence, consistency and legal care.

Who should attend

• HR and employee-relations practitioners

• Business owners, directors and senior managers

• School principals, bursars and HR teams

• Operations managers

• Anyone responsible for workplace discipline, investigations or compliance

Dishonesty cases can carry significant operational, financial and reputational risk. Ensure your organisation is prepared to investigate thoroughly, assess the evidence properly and make decisions that can withstand scrutiny.